Jes Staley Faces Barclays’ Shareholders: A Blow for Whistle-blowing When We Need It Most

Today’s post looks at the developing story of Barclays’ CEO Jes Staley, who is currently facing hundreds of the company’s shareholders in their AGM. Staley, only in the position for two years, is facing calls for his resignation because he, self-admittedly, attempted on two separate occasions to uncover the identity of an internal whistle-blower who had made allegations against a newly hired executive in the U.S. This shortened post will briefly look at this unfolding story, including some other elements that are not helping Mr Staley’s reputation, and then ask what the result of this AGM may mean for the socially important role of the whistle blower.

In 2016, Tim Main, a close friend of new Barclays CEO Jes Staley from their time together at JP Morgan, was hired for a senior position within Barclays’ American operations. Shortly afterwards, two complaints were brought forward against Mr Main and, in response, Mr Staley approached the Internal Head of Security to uncover the identity of the whistle blower. Staley had asked Mr Oerting, the Head of Security, to reveal the identity of the complainant because he considered the complaints to be ‘an unfair personal attack on the senior employee’, a request which was denied with Staley being informed that this was in contravention of whistle-blowing regulations. Yet, Staley tried again, and for this he is being formally investigated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Internally, Staley has been formally reprimanded, and will see his £1.4 million bonus cut – although he still retains the support of the Board, with the notoriously trigger-happy Chairman, John McFarlane (or ‘Mac-the-knife’ as he is referred to for the ease in which he fires CEOs) stating that ‘as long as he wasn’t successful in identifying the individual’ he would retain the support of the Board. It appears Staley, who also made the news recently because of his support for his Brother-in-Law against the interests of the major Barclays supporter, will survive the uprising by certain investors and remain in the role, but the real issue here is what this case means for the idealised role of the whistle-blower.


Whistle-blowing is an extremely important social function, and in theory serves as an important component of an efficient organisational structure. However, in reality the life of a whistle-blower can be extraordinarily dangerous, and as one researcher puts it ‘the reality of whistleblowing is grim. Few whistleblowers succeed in effecting change; even fewer are regarded as heroes or martyrs’. If we take a step back for one moment, the current political and financial arena dictates that we need whistle-blowers now more than ever, because the threat of deregulation in the Western World means that the people who are designated to find and eliminate illegal practices – regulators – will no longer be there to do so, at least in any great number. Some investors at Barclays have been noted as saying that they cannot see ‘how Jes Staley will survive this, particularly with US and UK regulators investigating’ and that, in itself, will be the telling factor in this story. How the regulators choose to discipline Staley, if at all, will be the clearest indicator as to the State’s economic viewpoints, because without the ideological protection that is needed to support whistle-blowing being confirmed, the chances of someone reporting malfeasance, as we (potentially) move towards a deregulatory phase only 10 years after the Financial Crisis, is reduced to near zero. The appalling sentiment displayed by McFarlane, who in his role as Chairman of one of the largest and most influential banks in the world should be encouraging whistle-blowing to signal to outsiders that his bank takes negating illegality seriously, is telling of the culture within these socially-intertwined banks. Whether or not Staley succeeded in uncovering the identity of the whistle-blower, and irrespective of his intentions were he to obtain that information, he must be removed from his position. The reason why, apart from the illegality of his actions, is a conceptual one. Potential whistle-blowers must know that they will be protected, and that those that seek to act against them will be punished in the harshest terms to set an example. Yet, today we hear that Jes Staley will have his £1.4 million bonus ‘cut’ – this indeed sets an example, and it is an appalling one for the plight of the potential whistle-blower.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lloyds Bank and the PPI Scandal: The Premature ‘Out of the Woods’ Rhetoric

Image
Today’s very short post focuses upon the news that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently extended the deadline to claim compensation for mis-sold ‘Payment Protection Insurance’ (PPI). Whilst a lot of financial institutions will have to prepare to offset the extended deadline, it is Lloyds that has grabbed the business headlines by apportioning an extra £350 million to offset any further claims that may be made of it – however, this comes only a week or two after the Bank posted its best performance figures in over a decade, as was previously discussed in Financial Regulation Matters . This post will therefore argue that the rhetoric being advanced recently regarding Lloyds – rhetoric like Lloyds represents ‘ a modern day success story ’ is wide of the mark and creates a false sense of security that we simply cannot afford to believe in. The ‘ robust recovery ’ was heralded far and wide upon the publication of Lloyds Bank’s financial performance for the previous fi...
Read more

The Analytical Credit Rating Agency: A New Entrant That Will Further Enhance Russia’s Isolation

Image
This short post is based upon a forthcoming article by this author that examines the viability of the latest entrant into the credit rating arena, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA). The article, which is due to be published in the European Company Law Journal (and is available here in a pre-published version), looks at the chances of the ACRA succeeding when viewed within the parameters of perception , an aspect that underpins the credit rating sector. For this post, the focus will be upon introducing the ACRA, and then on examining the effect it may have upon the wider political issues affecting the Russian Federation. The Analytical Credit Rating Agency was established in November 2015 and comprises of 27 major Russian companies and financial institutions that serve as its shareholders. The agency, which became the first rating agency to receive accreditation from the Russian Central Bank under the new N 222-FZ Law which was designed to protect investors, has a re...
Read more

British McDonald’s Workers To Go On Strike: The Enduring Legacy of Corporate Greed and Political Irresponsibility

Image
Today’s post reacts to the news that next week, in the UK, workers will make history by staging a strike at two McDonald’s restaurants – one in London and one in Cambridge. The first strike of its kind in McDonald’s British history is a result of poor working conditions, the use of the infamous ‘zero-hour’ contracts, and a demand for an increase in the minimum wage paid to McDonald’s employees. In this post this particular story will be used a vehicle to cover an aspect that has almost become accepted in the mainstream media, unfortunately, and that is the concept of austerity and its repulsive effects. Whilst onlookers hope that the strike will see a revolution-of-sorts amongst the fast-food industry with regards to working conditions, the reality it is that the underlying causes of the grievances aired by the staff will remain whatever the outcome of the strike, as the problem is a systemic problem. The proposed strike, which is scheduled to take place on Monday 4 th Septembe...
Read more