A New Regulatory Approach for the Accounting Industry, But Same Old Results
The second post today is a short follow up from a post
earlier in the year that looked at the leniency
of the deterrent selected for the accounting industry. In that post we
looked at how the SEC and the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) were handing
out ‘record fines’ of £5m here or $6 million there, something which onlookers
noted was ‘less
than half a day’s work’ for these top-four Auditors. Therefore, you can
imagine this author’s delight when reading the headline in the Financial Times yesterday that a ‘review recommends
larger fines for accountancy firms’; yet, regular readers of Financial Regulation Matters know that
there was no such delight, because the rest of the article could have been written
without one having read it.
Obviously, the article goes on to confirm that, as
suspected, the increase in fines was not really worthy of a headline, if the increase
even goes ahead at all. In the report
commissioned by the FRC and led by for Court of Appeal Judge Christopher
Clarke, it was mentioned that as a starting point the firms should not be able
to profit from wrongdoing (although they stated that identifying that profit
may be difficult owing to the nature of the business of auditing) and that ultimately
the ability to fine firms should be significantly
increased. The article in the FT makes the obvious comparison between
largest penalties attributed by the FRC and the FCA, with the FRC’s being £5.1
million and the FCA’s being £284 million – in reality, the FCA’s level of fines
also needs to be addressed. The most startling sentence in the article – ‘the
most controversial measure proposed by the review would enable the regulator to
fine large accounting firms by more than £10m’ – is perhaps indicative of where
the regulatory framework is up to. Whilst Clarke rightly notes that the smaller
fines like we have now are probably just recognised as ‘the cost of doing
business’, it is unlikely that fines of £10 million will fare much differently,
something with Professor Ramanna calls the ‘800-pound
gorilla’ in the room.
Unfortunately, if we were to look at actions rather than
words, then this report is particularly
poor. Not to judge Clarke’s intent, but looking at the actions paints a picture
whereby the capability of a regulator to control an industry which is
inexplicably linked to corporate wrongdoing is called into question, and the
result of extensive investigation is that they should raise their fines by a
total of £5 million at a time, against companies that post revenues in the
billions and profits in the hundreds of millions. Right now is the time for
regulators to work via actions rather than statements, but unfortunately this report
does exactly the opposite, and the auditing industry will have taken notice – what message would then have received?
Business as usual….
Keywords – Accounting, Auditing, Financial Regulation,
Financial Reporting Council, Fines, Crime, White Collar Crime, @finregmatters
Comments
Post a Comment