Reports of Credit Rating Agencies Moving into the ESG Marketplace

Earlier this month, the Financial Times reported that the Big Three credit rating agencies were continuing to make their move into the ESG marketplace via a number of concerted deals. This report falls directly in line with the analysis I developed in my recent book The Role of Credit Rating Agencies in Responsible Finance and in an article last year entitled Sustainable Finance Ratings as the Latest Symptom of “Rating Addiction”. As I will be producing a chapter for a book next year, with that chapter being entitled Sustainable Rating Agencies, it seems prudent to review the market and its developments.

The FT begins by noting that Moody’s has been making particular waves in the marketplace, as they purchased a majority stake in Vigeo Eiris earlier this year, and followed this with the purchasing of Four Twenty Seven. In June, S&P published its first ESG evaluation – of the company NextEra Energy. The article goes on to discuss how experts believe the market for sustainable-based ratings will grow from $200 to $500 million in the next few years, with one onlooker stating that the two agencies ‘know this will be a big market in the future and it will only grow’. The article makes the accurate connection between the growth of the marketplace, the attention of the rating agencies, and regulatory designs which are pushing for increased sustainability disclosures. This policy will, naturally, increase the need for the verification and categorisation of this increased data. It should also have the theoretical effect of making ESG-based ratings much more accurate, as disclosure increases.

However, that is only theoretical. The article discusses how research has shown that the agencies, whilst focusing more on ESG, are not disclosing their methodologies and, as a result, ‘ESG ratings from different sources are aligned in about 6 out of 10 cases, whereas regular ratings for creditworthiness match 99% of the time’. Whilst we may not want conformity in this particular instance, a divergence of 40% seems to be too large for investors to incorporate and understand. There are attempts to resolve this issue – standards boards are aiming at creating a single rating spectrum – but the accepted understanding is that this is some way off, if at all.

In my book I raised the issue of the credit rating agencies moving into the marketplace in such a concerted way, that there was bound to be problems. This report suggests that such a conclusion may well be accurate. If the Top Two, in particular, continue at the pace they are setting, then they will devour the market for ESG/sustainable ratings. If they do, then investors will be left with just two choices. Perhaps some investors may suggest this is preferable, given the massive divergence that exists currently within the ratings sphere regarding ESG/sustainability. However, there is then scope for the engrained conflicts of interest within the credit rating model to affect the sustainable finance field. If the sustainable finance field is, as some would suggest, the best response to the Crisis-era, then exposing that to the engrained conflicts of interests within the credit rating industry may not be so preferable. It is worth continuing to monitor this market, if only to confirm the hypotheses that the oligopolistic credit rating industry is on its way to devouring the ESG/sustainable ratings field.


Keywords – credit rating agencies, business, ESG, sustainable finance, @finregmatters

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lloyds Bank and the PPI Scandal: The Premature ‘Out of the Woods’ Rhetoric

Image
Today’s very short post focuses upon the news that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently extended the deadline to claim compensation for mis-sold ‘Payment Protection Insurance’ (PPI). Whilst a lot of financial institutions will have to prepare to offset the extended deadline, it is Lloyds that has grabbed the business headlines by apportioning an extra £350 million to offset any further claims that may be made of it – however, this comes only a week or two after the Bank posted its best performance figures in over a decade, as was previously discussed in Financial Regulation Matters . This post will therefore argue that the rhetoric being advanced recently regarding Lloyds – rhetoric like Lloyds represents ‘ a modern day success story ’ is wide of the mark and creates a false sense of security that we simply cannot afford to believe in. The ‘ robust recovery ’ was heralded far and wide upon the publication of Lloyds Bank’s financial performance for the previous fi
Read more

The Analytical Credit Rating Agency: A New Entrant That Will Further Enhance Russia’s Isolation

Image
This short post is based upon a forthcoming article by this author that examines the viability of the latest entrant into the credit rating arena, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA). The article, which is due to be published in the European Company Law Journal (and is available here in a pre-published version), looks at the chances of the ACRA succeeding when viewed within the parameters of perception , an aspect that underpins the credit rating sector. For this post, the focus will be upon introducing the ACRA, and then on examining the effect it may have upon the wider political issues affecting the Russian Federation. The Analytical Credit Rating Agency was established in November 2015 and comprises of 27 major Russian companies and financial institutions that serve as its shareholders. The agency, which became the first rating agency to receive accreditation from the Russian Central Bank under the new N 222-FZ Law which was designed to protect investors, has a re
Read more

The Case of Purdue Pharma, the Sackler Family, and the Opioid Crisis

Image
In the first of two short posts today, we will look at the case of the billionaire Sackler Family and their remarkable effect upon American society. The family, who own Purdue Pharma amongst a list of other ventures, have this week seen a massive legal action taken against them by the State of New York who argue that the company is ‘ responsible for the opioid epidemic ’ sweeping through the United States. The attorney-general for New York has called the lawsuit the ‘ nation’s most extensive ’ with respect to the pharmaceutical industry and comes right on the heels of a $270 million suit that was settled in the State of Oklahoma on exactly the same grounds. Whilst the company and the billionaire family who own it did not admit guilt (settling parties rarely do, hence why they settle outside of court) it has potentially opened the trapdoors for litigation. It comes as no surprise then that the company is reportedly considering bankruptcy proceedings in the face of such an onsl
Read more