MPs Sharpen Their Attention on Gambling Regulation
Over the years here in Financial
Regulation Matters, we have looked at a number of elements of ‘consumer
protection’, broadly defined. From predatory
lenders to governmental
policies that disproportionately affect the poor (and everything in between
like the larger
culture of credit dependency), we have seen a number of examples of when
capitalism and vulnerable people collide, and vulnerable people are exploited.
One area where this concept is visible is within the gambling arena whereby,
since 2005 with the Gambling Act,
the marketplace for in-person and online gambling has ballooned. However, an
influential group of MPs are now seeking to address this issue, and even just
that sentiment is already having a demonstrable effect.
The headlines in the media run with the fact that, since the
influential All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for Gambling Related Harm
recently published
a report calling for the Gambling Act 2005 to be fundamentally reconsidered,
shares in British gambling firms have tumbled and lost
nearly £1.2 billion in value. One of the elements that the APPG are
attempting to enforce, in line with the approach demonstrated by the Labour
Party, is that the limit of £2 that applies to stakes placed on fixed-odds
betting terminals should be applied similarly to web-based slot machine games.
The reason why this has caused such an immediate impact in the gambling arena
is because, as stated in The Guardian
who cite the Gambling Commission, the income from those web-based games ‘accounts
for more than a third of their income’. It is easy to see why the value
would plummet. The marketplace is already reeling from a number of regulatory
interventions, one of which included the restriction on stakes on high street
roulette games. With the market’s fear being that a similar restriction would
be placed onto online games like roulette, then it is no surprise to see
online-based gambling organisations like 888 being hardest hit – they lost
nearly 14% of their value in one day, equating to £91m. Ladbrokes’ owner GVG
fared even worse, with their 10.5% fall equating to £547m coming off their
market value.
Today, the largest gambling organisations in the country
responding by declaring their adherence to ‘five
pledges’ that would promote safer gambling. They are: to prevent underage
gambling and protect young people; increase support for treatment of gambling
harm; to strengthen and expand codes of practice for advertising and marketing;
to protect and empower customers, and to promote a culture of safer gambling.
However, this is unlikely to stop the advancing regulatory hoard. Research has
suggested that previous initiatives like the ‘when the fun stops, stop’
campaign have been entirely ineffective, which suggests that the adherence to
these pledges will not have any great affect. Research conducted before the
Financial Crisis suggests that ‘disadvantaged social
groups who experience poverty, unemployment, dependence on welfare, and low levels
of education and household income are most likely to suffer the adverse consequences
of increased gambling’. This has been further emphasised by researchers who
argue that problem
gambling is often supplemented by a number of other issues, like mental
health issues, which contribute to a negative social impact.
One thing that can be suggested is that the gambling
companies have ridden a regulatory wave that is soon to run out by all
accounts. Whilst health-based regulatory endeavours like the campaigns to
reduce smoking are up against traditionally large and well-resourced corporate
entities, the gambling-based regulatory endeavours have much less of an
obstacle in their way. With the cross-party support provided by the APPG
proving influential, it may not even take a Labour Government to fundamentally
restrict the growth of the gambling arena, but their election in December would
almost confirm the demise of the sector. The gambling companies have left it
too late to respond, with their five pledges being dismissed out of hand almost
immediately. It will be fascinating to see whether the writing is really on the
wall for the British Gambling scene.
Keywords – Gambling, business, regulation, government, @finregmatters
Comments
Post a Comment