Lagarde Seeks to Assert the ECB’s Dominance – and it could affect the sustainable/credit rating market
Lagarde spoke recently and in emphasising her unhappiness
with the development of sustainability in the marketplace, declared that ‘climate
risks are not adequately priced’. The article in Bloomberg’s Quint offering
suggests that she may lead the ECB in a new direction, with the decisions on
which companies and industries to lend support to would be tied to compliance
to EU policies on the issue of tackling climate change. The suggestion is that
Lagarde could take the ECB down one of two paths; the soft path being to urge
companies to better disclose climate risks that they face, and the more extreme
path of judging who should benefit from the ECB’s mammoth bond-buying programme
in relation to their compliance with EU regulations on non-financial
informational disclosure, and the wider Action Plan that will contribute to the
eventual goal contained within the European Green Deal. There are a
number of arguments against this more extreme approach, mostly consisting of
the lack of authority for the ECB to do this. Furthermore, the EU is seeking to
become a ‘less is more’ style institution, which goes against the concept of
the ECB becoming the enforcement vehicle for the Action Plan. However, analysts
from Hermes have been cited as saying ‘the ECB has been very vocal about its intentions
to continue to fight the climate crisis… its ambitions are very serious’. For
Lagarde, she has rightly bemoaned the understanding that information that is
currently being declared is ‘at best inconsistent, largely incomparable, and at
times unreliable’. Whilst the ECB does have the mandate to support the EU’s
economic policies, it rarely does so in such an explicit manner. Options that have
been suggested range from introducing adjusted ‘haircuts’ that could be applied
to securities after their climate risk has been assessed, to outright exclusion
from purchasing programmes. If the ECB does decide to take a more direct
approach, the credit/sustainable rating environment could be impacted.
This is because the disclosure of non-financial information
is of, arguably, crucial importance for the development of the two
interconnected industries. The mainstreaming of ESG and its variants are
bringing the two industries together more and more. We can see this when it
comes to the M&A activity that has seen a number of ESG data
providers/raters be absorbed into the leading credit rating agencies. This
pressure from the ECB is leading towards an endpoint that I have been speaking
about recently in that one of the key issues for ESG providers is that they do
not have the necessary information to provide truly valuable ratings etc. If
the ECB is successful in forcing better rates of disclosure, and encouraging
better compliance with the new sustainability finance disclosure regulations,
then that issue will, potentially, be resolved. The question then becomes whether
the ESG providers can then provide that quality, which I argue misses the
point. I argue that it is not necessarily the value of the ratings that are the
issue, but that the ability to compare ratings against each other, and also the
ease at which the ratings can be assimilated into informational processes, are
the issue for the marketplace. Furthermore, the more that the sustainable
finance field becomes prevalent, the more important it will be for the largest
investors to signal to their dispersed investor base the quality of what
they are investing in and considering – would a dispersed investor recognise CDP
over S&P? The signalling potential of a credit rating agency that has
absorbed the ESG rating service is, potentially, one of the strongest factors
in the bourgeoning marketplace for sustainable finance and, in truth, we are
almost there when we look at the M&A activity – there are not many
stand-alone ESG providers left who have not been exposed to this campaign in
some way, shape, or form. The ECB’s radical change from its neutral standpoint,
if implemented, will be just another component in bringing about the
eventuality I have described here.
Keywords – ECB, central bank, credit ratings, ESG, @finregmatters
Comments
Post a Comment