Chinese Credit Rating Agencies in the Firing Line


We have reviewed the credit rating situation in China extensively here in Financial Regulation Matters (see here) and it is well known that the Chinese rating agencies are under massive pressure, both from the Chinese State and also the opening up of the domestic marketplace to the international credit rating agencies for the first time. However, the underlying political dynamics within the Chinese marketplace means that the credit rating agencies within the country are between a rock and a hard place and, yesterday, one of the Chinese credit rating agencies found themselves being thrown between the two.

 

The Chinese domestic marketplace is in a precarious position at the moment, as a number of defaults rock the confidence in domestic corporate debt market. Whilst this is a trend across the world of course, there have been a number of high profile defaults recently within a relatively short space of time. What increases the pressure is that a number of ‘State-Owned Enterprises’ (SOE) are now joining that list, including Yongcheng Coal and Huachen, the Chinese entity who have partnered with BMW to manufacture in the country. The common assumption has always been that if these SOEs were to fail, then the local government would step in to bail them out. However, in the current climate, that has not been the case. Whilst this belief that the SOEs were ‘too big to fail’ will no doubt cause massive issues, there is a credit rating dynamic that is currently in the process of coming to light and will no reverberate around the domestic market. For a company to issue public debt in China, it must be rated Double-A or above. The Financial Times reports that just 5 out of 5000 companies have been downgraded below the AA threshold, and that more than 98% of the country’s outstanding debt is rated at AA or above. The flow of capital within the Chinese marketplace is vital to the world’s 2nd largest economy, which can explain why the credit rating agencies are so reluctant to downgrade the companies, even in the face of massive criticism for not doing so. However, as the rate of defaults increase, something has to give. The first sign that this has already started came yesterday, when it was announced that a former general manager of the Golden Credit Rating Agency is to be prosecuted by the Chinese Authorities. This is for allegedly taking ‘massive’ bribes, and comes a day after the People’s Bank of China affirmed that it was improving and increasing its supervision of the domestic industry. Then, today, the Chinese State went further and suspended Golden Credit and would not allow it to take on new business for at least 3 months. The Authorities state that the agency had been issuing artificially high ratings and, ultimately, had ‘constrained the high quality development’ of the country’s bond market. Golden Credit, in response, labelled it a ‘political’ move that was designed to scapegoat the agency and set an example.

 

Either way, the trajectory of the Chinese domestic marketplace is likely set in stone. The agencies have no authority in the eyes of external investors and, increasingly, they are losing it domestically. That means that either a. there will have to be a root-and-branch level of reform undertaken within the domestic marketplace which includes, somehow releasing the political pressure within the country, or b. the international credit rating agencies will begin their assault on the domestic marketplace and really establish themselves, so much so that the domestic rating industry dwindles anyway. The first is very much unlikely, particularly as the political pressure will only grow stronger as the country continues to vie to be the world’s superpower. The second is also unlikely, as the international credit rating agencies that have gained access have already declared that they will not be operating their usual methodologies, but China-specific models which, presumably, will be sensitive of the political framework that exists in the country. But, something has to give. What that will be we do not know, but there will likely be more casualties in the domestic credit rating market as the country tries to show that this was the work of a few bad apples, rather than a systemic problem.

 

Keywords – China, credit rating, politics, Golden Credit Rating, @finregmatters

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Analytical Credit Rating Agency: A New Entrant That Will Further Enhance Russia’s Isolation

Image
This short post is based upon a forthcoming article by this author that examines the viability of the latest entrant into the credit rating arena, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA). The article, which is due to be published in the European Company Law Journal (and is available here in a pre-published version), looks at the chances of the ACRA succeeding when viewed within the parameters of perception , an aspect that underpins the credit rating sector. For this post, the focus will be upon introducing the ACRA, and then on examining the effect it may have upon the wider political issues affecting the Russian Federation. The Analytical Credit Rating Agency was established in November 2015 and comprises of 27 major Russian companies and financial institutions that serve as its shareholders. The agency, which became the first rating agency to receive accreditation from the Russian Central Bank under the new N 222-FZ Law which was designed to protect investors, has a re...
Read more

Lloyds Bank and the PPI Scandal: The Premature ‘Out of the Woods’ Rhetoric

Image
Today’s very short post focuses upon the news that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently extended the deadline to claim compensation for mis-sold ‘Payment Protection Insurance’ (PPI). Whilst a lot of financial institutions will have to prepare to offset the extended deadline, it is Lloyds that has grabbed the business headlines by apportioning an extra £350 million to offset any further claims that may be made of it – however, this comes only a week or two after the Bank posted its best performance figures in over a decade, as was previously discussed in Financial Regulation Matters . This post will therefore argue that the rhetoric being advanced recently regarding Lloyds – rhetoric like Lloyds represents ‘ a modern day success story ’ is wide of the mark and creates a false sense of security that we simply cannot afford to believe in. The ‘ robust recovery ’ was heralded far and wide upon the publication of Lloyds Bank’s financial performance for the previous fi...
Read more

British McDonald’s Workers To Go On Strike: The Enduring Legacy of Corporate Greed and Political Irresponsibility

Image
Today’s post reacts to the news that next week, in the UK, workers will make history by staging a strike at two McDonald’s restaurants – one in London and one in Cambridge. The first strike of its kind in McDonald’s British history is a result of poor working conditions, the use of the infamous ‘zero-hour’ contracts, and a demand for an increase in the minimum wage paid to McDonald’s employees. In this post this particular story will be used a vehicle to cover an aspect that has almost become accepted in the mainstream media, unfortunately, and that is the concept of austerity and its repulsive effects. Whilst onlookers hope that the strike will see a revolution-of-sorts amongst the fast-food industry with regards to working conditions, the reality it is that the underlying causes of the grievances aired by the staff will remain whatever the outcome of the strike, as the problem is a systemic problem. The proposed strike, which is scheduled to take place on Monday 4 th Septembe...
Read more