MIT Launch “The Aggregate Confusion Project” to Work on ESG Rating Problems

In March 2020, when discussing concerns that had been raised regarding the ESG Ratings arena, we saw how an article developed by Professor Roberto Rigobon, Dr Florian Berg, and Dr Julian Kölbel argued that there are inherent divergences witnessed between the ratings within the ESG rating arena, and provided for a number of reasons as to why. Recently, via MIT and the MIT Sloan Sustainability Initiative, the team are launching the Aggregate Confusion Project to tackle those issues. 

The paper, published in August 2019, is entitled ‘Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings’ and is certainly worth reading. Its findings are particularly important, particularly in relation to the effects of measurement divergence in a range of contexts. Without spoiling the paper for those that have not read it yet, the key to the paper is understanding and demonstrating the ‘rater effect’ and how that is currently impacting upon the stunted development of the industry. More worryingly, the scholars find divergence between the identified agencies on factors that should not be causing divergence, like factual elements of whether a company is signed up to a global initiative etc. The article makes clear conclusions, and leave the door open with regards to the potential for the industry to develop if it becomes more transparent. In my forthcoming book Sustainable Rating Agencies vs Credit Rating Agencies: The Battle for the Investor, I argue that there are underlying factors that will ultimately, and negatively affect the trajectory of the ESG rating industry, but the findings in the article were vital components of that book. 

The new initiative ‘aims to develop a set of ESG tools and methodologies that will become best practice’. The overarching aims are to ‘make ESG integration more defensible and more workable for the industry, and to that end the project is now seeking asset managers and asset owners to join their team to make the research practicable. The team have suggested that whilst prospective member organisations will have different capacities and appetites for ESG integration, there will be a number of common tasks to be achieved, including:

·       Reduce the level of noise in measuring specific ESG categories such as labour treatment, carbon emissions, and product safety;

·       Understand the effect of ESG-driven investment flows on stock price and firm behaviour;

·       Develop smarter ways to aggregate ESG factors into composite indices; 

·       Reliably assess investor preferences to enable ESG indices to be more customized and attuned to investors’ values.

Details on how to contact the team are available on their webpage.

Whilst it is questionable whether ESG rating agencies, as they are understood, can satisfy the needs of the market they exist to serve, it is certainly important that they become more efficient; this project is a really positive step forwards. If the ESG rating agencies can have a closer connection to the market participants who use their products, then maybe the will not be a need to go elsewhere in search of obtaining the information, in the form that they need, as I have predicted. Nevertheless, the ESG rating agencies should be monitoring how the project develops because they could benefit greatly from the future connection to the market that the project will hopefully develop – there is scope for this project to become the PRI Credit Rating Initiative of the ESG Rating arena, which could be very impactful (despite the drawbacks of the PRI project as I have identified in other works).

 

Keywords – ESG, Rating, ESG rating agencies, MIT, @finregmatters

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lloyds Bank and the PPI Scandal: The Premature ‘Out of the Woods’ Rhetoric

Image
Today’s very short post focuses upon the news that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently extended the deadline to claim compensation for mis-sold ‘Payment Protection Insurance’ (PPI). Whilst a lot of financial institutions will have to prepare to offset the extended deadline, it is Lloyds that has grabbed the business headlines by apportioning an extra £350 million to offset any further claims that may be made of it – however, this comes only a week or two after the Bank posted its best performance figures in over a decade, as was previously discussed in Financial Regulation Matters . This post will therefore argue that the rhetoric being advanced recently regarding Lloyds – rhetoric like Lloyds represents ‘ a modern day success story ’ is wide of the mark and creates a false sense of security that we simply cannot afford to believe in. The ‘ robust recovery ’ was heralded far and wide upon the publication of Lloyds Bank’s financial performance for the previous fi
Read more

The Analytical Credit Rating Agency: A New Entrant That Will Further Enhance Russia’s Isolation

Image
This short post is based upon a forthcoming article by this author that examines the viability of the latest entrant into the credit rating arena, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA). The article, which is due to be published in the European Company Law Journal (and is available here in a pre-published version), looks at the chances of the ACRA succeeding when viewed within the parameters of perception , an aspect that underpins the credit rating sector. For this post, the focus will be upon introducing the ACRA, and then on examining the effect it may have upon the wider political issues affecting the Russian Federation. The Analytical Credit Rating Agency was established in November 2015 and comprises of 27 major Russian companies and financial institutions that serve as its shareholders. The agency, which became the first rating agency to receive accreditation from the Russian Central Bank under the new N 222-FZ Law which was designed to protect investors, has a re
Read more

The Case of Purdue Pharma, the Sackler Family, and the Opioid Crisis

Image
In the first of two short posts today, we will look at the case of the billionaire Sackler Family and their remarkable effect upon American society. The family, who own Purdue Pharma amongst a list of other ventures, have this week seen a massive legal action taken against them by the State of New York who argue that the company is ‘ responsible for the opioid epidemic ’ sweeping through the United States. The attorney-general for New York has called the lawsuit the ‘ nation’s most extensive ’ with respect to the pharmaceutical industry and comes right on the heels of a $270 million suit that was settled in the State of Oklahoma on exactly the same grounds. Whilst the company and the billionaire family who own it did not admit guilt (settling parties rarely do, hence why they settle outside of court) it has potentially opened the trapdoors for litigation. It comes as no surprise then that the company is reportedly considering bankruptcy proceedings in the face of such an onsl
Read more