The SEC Charges Morningstar for Violating Securities Law Relating to CMBS Ratings


News broke late yesterday that the US Securities and Exchange Commission was suing Morningstar for its ratings of commercial mortgage-backed securities that were issued from 2015 to 2016.

 

Reuters reports that ‘Morningstar’s credit ratings business allegedly violated disclosure and internal controls requirements in 30 commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions from 2015 to 2016 when the agency allowed analysts to make undisclosed adjustments to key stresses in its modelling, the SEC said’. Morningstar, who now issue ratings via their subsidiary DBRS Morningstar after their acquisition of DBRS in 2019, responded that they had complied with all regulatory requirements. However, the SEC alleges that Morningstar allowed its analysts to ‘frequently’ alter their ratings, with those changes being undisclosed and out of alignment with their published methodologies. The result of this was that issuers were subsequently able to lower their interest payments to investors without merit. In May 2020, Morningstar settled for $3.5m with the SEC after being charged with allowing their Asset-backed Securities rating analysts to engage with the sales and marketing efforts of the agency, which is clearly forbidden by law. The litigation for this currently alleged act has now started, and we await the results. However, it is likely we will see the same result as in May last year.

 

Keywords – credit rating agencies, SEC, Law, Morningstar, @finregmatters

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Credit Rating Agency ‘Gatekeepers’ open the Gates for Solar Asset-backed Securities Market, but at what cost?

Image
Whilst the concept of an ‘asset backed security’ was certainly not part of the common parlance before the Financial Crisis, now the concept (if not the technical detail) is perhaps more understand in the current climate. It is important to note that the concept and process of securitisation and asset-backed securitisation certainly is not an absolute negative, we know full well that it is open to abuse and that certain elements need to be witnessed for that abuse to occur. For this reason, this blog post reacts to the news that the credit rating agencies are in the process of opening the gates for solar-backed issuances to feed the hunger in the market for anything related to sustainability, ESG, and non-traditional sources of investment.   It was reported in GlobalCapital yesterday that ‘ ratings coverage gives investor boost to solar ABS market ’. It was noted that the solar ABS sector as a whole is set to hit new records for issuance volumes in 2021, and this was mainly due...
Read more

Ernst & Young (EY) and Moody’s Under Attack as Gatekeepers’ Failures Continue to be Revealed with Wirecard

Image
The Wirecard scandal has made for an engrossing account of corporate failure since the news emerged that the German financial payments processing company had been inflating its accounts. Now that the company has collapsed – the first time that a member of the German Dax index has failed – the ramifications are starting to be revealed. The EU is now investigating the role played by BaFin , the German regulator tasked with regulating the company, whilst the FCA in the UK has ordered the British arm of the company to freeze all of their customers’ accounts . Now that the aftermath is continuing to fold, the focus is now rightly turning to why the alarm bells were not sounded earlier by those both paid and expected to do so.   Of particular concern has been the auditing conducted by Ernst & Young (EY), and the credit rating conducted by Moody’s. With investors standing to lose out considerably because of this collapse, the performance of these gatekeepers is a massively impo...
Read more

Philip Green and the BHS Pension Scandal: A Cause of Change in British Company Law?

Image
Today’s post is a short reactionary post to the statements made today by the Prime Minister, Theresa May, regarding the potential future of Company Law in the U.K. With regards to the protection of pension funds within large businesses, Mrs May stated that ‘ today I am setting out our [the Conservative Party] plans, if elected, to ensure the pensions of ordinary people are protected against the actions of unscrupulous company bosses ’. In light of this, this post will look at the propelling rationale for this election campaign agenda, and also look at the reality of the situation by asking whether the Government would really punish the bosses of the largest and most influential companies in the country. The reason why the issue of company pension funds is being debated by the leaders of the main political parties in the U.K. is, predominantly, because of the scandal that emanated from the collapse of large British retailer British Home Stores last year. In Financial Regulation ...
Read more