The ‘Sword of Damocles’ Drops on RBS
For months we have been discussing the impending fine that
RBS was facing from the US DoJ with regards to their behaviour in the lead-up
to the Financial Crisis, and today RBS learned its fate. In this third and
final brief post today, we shall look at the details of that fine and examine
both the sentiment it creates, and any potential effect it may have upon RBS as
it continues its attempt to drag itself from a scandal-ridden decade.
The issue of RBS being fined by the DoJ has been on the table
for quite some time, with a number of elements coming in to play as RBS and
investors struggled to predict the outcome. We spoke recently about how even
the British government had inserted itself into the dynamic (lest we forget,
the UK Government is the majority shareholder in the bank), and it seems that
for all parties concerned, apart from the victims and the public of course,
today’s announcement will be being toasted in the offices of the bank (and
likely the Government) at the time of writing. The bank has agreed
a $4.9 (£3.6) billion penalty with the DoJ, which led CEO Ross McEwan to
proclaim that ‘today’s
announcement is a milestone moment for the bank’ and that ‘our current
shareholders will be very pleased this deal is done’. That is not surprising
given that estimations beforehand were that the bank would be forced to pay
anywhere up to $9 or $10 billion.
There was an instant impact, with share prices immediately
rising and, as cited in The Guardian,
the likelihood now being that the Bank will now be able to pass the Bank of
England’s stress testing mechanisms. However, there is likely to be an even
greater impact moving forward. In a previous post today we discussed the
concept of ‘amnesia’ within the financial sector, and developments such as
these are often the very moments that initiate that amnesia. That is not to
say, of course, that the bank should be prosecuted consistently, but it is the
sentiment that these moments cause which is the issue. The sentiment from the
business press, and RBS themselves, have not been ‘let us put this issue behind
us finally and seek to really address the underlying problems that caused such
poor behaviour’, but more ‘let us put this issue behind us finally and get back
to making money and providing dividends’; one may argue those two sentiments
are closely related, but they are not. One has within it the conscious effort
to re-develop the bank’s obviously transgressive approach, the other has the
aim of returning to a ‘results at whatever cost’ attitude that led to the bank
being charged almost $10 billion all told – the continuation of these
sentiments is remarkable, but only when you do not pay attention to the systemic issues within the sector. It is
unfortunate, but as the Bank continues to be the archetypal transgressive
banking institution – its performance in relation to the GRG unit is appalling –
the reality is that it is just one small component of a larger system that is
designed, or has been adopted to continuously milk society; today’s
announcement is a victory for RBS and the UK Government, but in truth it is a
clear indication that it is ‘business as usual’.
Keywords – Banking, RBS, politics, business, DoJ, @finregmatters
Comments
Post a Comment