Scandinavian Banks’ New Era of Scandal

On the back of revelations regarding Danske Bank and its connection to money laundering last year, it was revealed in the news yesterday that Birgitte Bonnesen, the CEO of Swedbank, had been relieved of her duties just minutes into the Bank’s AGM in relation to the organisation’s connection to dirty money. In this post we shall examine these connected cases further and learn more about the anti-money laundering issues facing banking organisations.

The incredibly reputable Danske Bank, Denmark’s largest lender, became embroiled in a money laundering scandal last year when it was revealed they had helped launder almost €200 billion in Russian and Baltic money since 2007. The case of Danske Bank revolves around the purchasing of an Estonian Bank that would become the vessel for money laundering from neighbouring States like Russia and the Baltic States. The leadership of Danske Bank were not only made aware of the issues as early as 2010, but actively promoted the increasing of ‘non-resident business’ i.e. money from non-Estonian Nationals up to a point when, in 2011, the Estonian Bank generated 11% of Danske’s total profits, despite only accounting for 0.5% of the bank’s total assets. There were a number of associated issues, like the bank having nobody in place as a compliance officer for anti-money laundering (flouting specific Danish laws in the process) and in 2014 a whistleblower brought to the attention of the Estonian bank’s leadership the fact that British LLPs (Limited Liability Partnerships) were being used to funnel money from people closely linked to Vladimir Putin and the Russian Intelligence Services. In 2015 the Bank closed its non-resident business in Estonia but they had not gotten away with their crimes, with Estonian prosecutors arresting 10 people in connection with the investigation and with Deutsche Bank’s American subsidiary being dragged into the mire for good measure.

The once reputable Scandinavian sector took a massive hit over Danske and today Swedbank looks set to add to this degeneration in standards. The bank was raided this week by Swedish authorities looking for evidence of fraud and insider trading, whilst the US is currently probing Swedbank for its role in the Danske Bank scandal. The rumour is that Swedbank handled more than €135 billion in assets from ‘high risk clients’ and that the bank’s connection to Danske, and interesting Mossack Fonseca, is the cause for the probe. The Swedish Prime Minister – Stefan Lofven – stated that ‘this is absolutely unacceptable’ because scandals such as these ‘destroys confidence in the financial system which is important for society’. It is interesting to note that, even in Scandinavia where societal issues are, by and large, given much more reverence than in Europe and the US, the plague of transgressive finance has still managed to take a foothold. With Swedbank being potentially implicated in the Donald Trump affair – there is a suggestion that the bank handled payments from Ukraine to Trump’s campaign manager Paul Monafort – it is likely that this is just the start of a very long and very painful road for the bank, and most likely the Swedish financial system.


Keywords – Banking, Swedbank, Danske Bank, Money Laundering, @finregmatters

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lloyds Bank and the PPI Scandal: The Premature ‘Out of the Woods’ Rhetoric

Image
Today’s very short post focuses upon the news that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently extended the deadline to claim compensation for mis-sold ‘Payment Protection Insurance’ (PPI). Whilst a lot of financial institutions will have to prepare to offset the extended deadline, it is Lloyds that has grabbed the business headlines by apportioning an extra £350 million to offset any further claims that may be made of it – however, this comes only a week or two after the Bank posted its best performance figures in over a decade, as was previously discussed in Financial Regulation Matters . This post will therefore argue that the rhetoric being advanced recently regarding Lloyds – rhetoric like Lloyds represents ‘ a modern day success story ’ is wide of the mark and creates a false sense of security that we simply cannot afford to believe in. The ‘ robust recovery ’ was heralded far and wide upon the publication of Lloyds Bank’s financial performance for the previous fi
Read more

The Analytical Credit Rating Agency: A New Entrant That Will Further Enhance Russia’s Isolation

Image
This short post is based upon a forthcoming article by this author that examines the viability of the latest entrant into the credit rating arena, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA). The article, which is due to be published in the European Company Law Journal (and is available here in a pre-published version), looks at the chances of the ACRA succeeding when viewed within the parameters of perception , an aspect that underpins the credit rating sector. For this post, the focus will be upon introducing the ACRA, and then on examining the effect it may have upon the wider political issues affecting the Russian Federation. The Analytical Credit Rating Agency was established in November 2015 and comprises of 27 major Russian companies and financial institutions that serve as its shareholders. The agency, which became the first rating agency to receive accreditation from the Russian Central Bank under the new N 222-FZ Law which was designed to protect investors, has a re
Read more

The Case of Purdue Pharma, the Sackler Family, and the Opioid Crisis

Image
In the first of two short posts today, we will look at the case of the billionaire Sackler Family and their remarkable effect upon American society. The family, who own Purdue Pharma amongst a list of other ventures, have this week seen a massive legal action taken against them by the State of New York who argue that the company is ‘ responsible for the opioid epidemic ’ sweeping through the United States. The attorney-general for New York has called the lawsuit the ‘ nation’s most extensive ’ with respect to the pharmaceutical industry and comes right on the heels of a $270 million suit that was settled in the State of Oklahoma on exactly the same grounds. Whilst the company and the billionaire family who own it did not admit guilt (settling parties rarely do, hence why they settle outside of court) it has potentially opened the trapdoors for litigation. It comes as no surprise then that the company is reportedly considering bankruptcy proceedings in the face of such an onsl
Read more