An Update on Carlos Ghosn

The title of this last of three posts today is a little misleading, because it would probably need a dedicated team to keep up-to-date on the case of Carlos Ghosn. In November 2018 we heard from Oluwarotimi Adeniyi-Akintola of Aston Law School how Carlos Ghosn had been accused of financial improprieties and the falsification of securities reports or, as The Independent put it, Nissan had found that he had engaged in the personal use of company money and had under-reported his income in violation of Japanese law. However, since then, the case has taken an almost soap-opera style turn and today, in front of a packed room of reporters in Lebanon, the former Chair of the Nissan Alliance put forward his case as to why he had circumvented the conditions of his House Arrest in Japan and fled to Lebanon.

After being charged by Japanese authorities last year, Ghosn had posted a £6.8 million bail in April. Owing to his abilities and connections, the bail deal was structured so that he was to be monitored by a 24-hour camera inside his house, that his use of technology was to be restricted, and that he was to be banned from travelling abroad – his passports were to be kept at the offices of his Lawyers in Japan. However, in a statement emanating from Lebanon on New Year’s Eve, Ghosn declared ‘I have escaped injustice and political persecution’. Ghosn was born in Brazil to parents of Lebanese descent and, crucially, there is no extradition agreement between Lebanon and Japan. How he managed to escape Japan has been the subject of much debate in the New Year. Although Ghosn today did not confirm how, suggestions have been put forward that he was smuggled through an airport in a musical equipment case to a private jet, by a private security firm that he hired. This suggestion, however, has been dismissed widely and the originator of the story – MTV – have provided no evidence for it. Yet, conversely, the Financial Times ran a story on the former Green Beret who allegedly masterminded the escape.

Nevertheless, the case will no doubt continue to amaze. Today, Ghosn stated that he is not above the law, and looks forward to defending his name in a place that he believes will give him a fair trial (a privilege not shared across society of course). Ghosn has shaped the narrative that insiders within Nissan, and the Japanese system moreover, were against his plans to bring Nissan and Renault closer together and, he proposes, the only way they saw to prevent that was to aim for Ghosn himself. For their part, the Japanese prosecutors denied conspiratorial connections with Nissan and stated, quite rightly, that in addition to confirming that Ghosn had broken more Japanese laws by escaping, that he had provided no further evidence to exonerate him from the charges originally brought against him. It appears that a standoff will ensure whereby Ghosn must only stay in countries that do not have extradition treaties with Japan and, if he does so, there will be no recourse for the Japanese prosecutors.


Keywords – Carlos Ghosn, Nissan, Japan, Justice, Law, Business, @finregmatters

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lloyds Bank and the PPI Scandal: The Premature ‘Out of the Woods’ Rhetoric

Image
Today’s very short post focuses upon the news that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently extended the deadline to claim compensation for mis-sold ‘Payment Protection Insurance’ (PPI). Whilst a lot of financial institutions will have to prepare to offset the extended deadline, it is Lloyds that has grabbed the business headlines by apportioning an extra £350 million to offset any further claims that may be made of it – however, this comes only a week or two after the Bank posted its best performance figures in over a decade, as was previously discussed in Financial Regulation Matters . This post will therefore argue that the rhetoric being advanced recently regarding Lloyds – rhetoric like Lloyds represents ‘ a modern day success story ’ is wide of the mark and creates a false sense of security that we simply cannot afford to believe in. The ‘ robust recovery ’ was heralded far and wide upon the publication of Lloyds Bank’s financial performance for the previous fi
Read more

The Analytical Credit Rating Agency: A New Entrant That Will Further Enhance Russia’s Isolation

Image
This short post is based upon a forthcoming article by this author that examines the viability of the latest entrant into the credit rating arena, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA). The article, which is due to be published in the European Company Law Journal (and is available here in a pre-published version), looks at the chances of the ACRA succeeding when viewed within the parameters of perception , an aspect that underpins the credit rating sector. For this post, the focus will be upon introducing the ACRA, and then on examining the effect it may have upon the wider political issues affecting the Russian Federation. The Analytical Credit Rating Agency was established in November 2015 and comprises of 27 major Russian companies and financial institutions that serve as its shareholders. The agency, which became the first rating agency to receive accreditation from the Russian Central Bank under the new N 222-FZ Law which was designed to protect investors, has a re
Read more

The Case of Purdue Pharma, the Sackler Family, and the Opioid Crisis

Image
In the first of two short posts today, we will look at the case of the billionaire Sackler Family and their remarkable effect upon American society. The family, who own Purdue Pharma amongst a list of other ventures, have this week seen a massive legal action taken against them by the State of New York who argue that the company is ‘ responsible for the opioid epidemic ’ sweeping through the United States. The attorney-general for New York has called the lawsuit the ‘ nation’s most extensive ’ with respect to the pharmaceutical industry and comes right on the heels of a $270 million suit that was settled in the State of Oklahoma on exactly the same grounds. Whilst the company and the billionaire family who own it did not admit guilt (settling parties rarely do, hence why they settle outside of court) it has potentially opened the trapdoors for litigation. It comes as no surprise then that the company is reportedly considering bankruptcy proceedings in the face of such an onsl
Read more