Slight Fears Raised for Scope Ratings
In the first of three short posts today, this particular
post will continue analysis that we started here in Financial Regulation Matters in early 2018. We first previewed
an article on Scope Ratings that I
had written for the European
Company Law journal in February 2018, and then followed that up with an update in May 2019 here.
As the company was recently featured in the Financial
Times, a small further update would be good to keep us abreast of the
development of this European-based challenger to the Big Three’s hegemony.
The last time we assessed Scope Ratings, all was positive.
They had grown their workforce from around 50 to over 200 staff, and also had
received the fantastic boon of a number of major insurance companies coming on
board with the project. HDI and Signal Iduna had joined as investors, taking
the investor pool to over 70. However, in the Financial Times article dated 2nd January, and entitled ‘Scope
faces uphill struggle to crack credit rating market’, the article attempts
to present a sentiment that all is not going well any more. This is based on
both a stalling of Scope’s revenues for the first time – according to the
article, ‘Scope’s revenues have stalled over the first nine months of 2019,
while its losses before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation widened
to €14.3m’ – and that, after all of its successes, it still only controls 0.5%
of the European credit rating market, languishing behind competitors like DBRS.
However, Scope have responded by declaring that this loss was caused by
regulatory changes that damaged its structured finance rating business, and
that the company fully expected revenues to increase by 50% in 2020 and that
the firm would be looking to break even in 2021.
As a relatively young endeavour, in a particularly crowded
and oligopolistic marketplace, the chances of Scope ever swaying in and dominating
the scene where next to impossible, and so it has proven. However, in their
region, they are performing well. They are also riding on a wave of goodwill,
with major investors remaining calm and certain that although the firm is still
in its investment stage, ‘we think
it is an achievable goal’. Scope has certain backers, like the largest
single investor in BMW, who has backed the firm because he wants to see a
serious European-based contender to the Big Three. Although, there are still
detractors of course, with asset managers stating that the issue is that whilst
Scope’s analysis may be good, Scope’s rating cannot drive changes in credit
spreads, whilst S&P and Moody’s can. Yet, at this stage of the firm’s
development, there is clearly no need to worry. The reporting of the article
is, admittedly, still positive about the endeavour and the 2019 losses do need
to be reported; it is almost guaranteed that Scope’s progression will contain
bumps along the way, and perhaps this is its first. If we look at its
progression on a long-term basis, then the firm should still be very much on
course to make some sort of meaningful impact upon the credit rating market,
whatever that may relatively look like.
Keywords – Scope Ratings, Business, Credit rating agencies,
Europe, @finregmatters
Comments
Post a Comment