Liberty Global’s Push to merge Virgin Media with 02 Signals the post-Brexit Reality


In today’s short post, a nuanced point that is being overlooked by many in the business press will be discussed regarding the news that Liberty Global, the owner of the UK-based Virgin Media company, is in talks with Telefonica regarding the purchase of its ‘02’ brand. One of the issues that is arising out of this proposed merger, on top of the competition-based issues that will no doubt arise, is how it will be possible and, more importantly, why it will be possible when recent attempts to buy 02 (from a number of companies) have been ruled out on competition-based grounds.

It was reported late last week that Liberty Global – the massive telecommunications conglomerate ran by John Malone that also owns Formula One – was in talks with the owner of 02 – Telefonica – regarding the purchasing of the company. The supposed merger would be a 50/50 split between Virgin Media and 02, and Liberty Global would need to make a payment to Telefonica to equalise the ownership. The move would be an important one for Virgin Media, as it would at once both combine the 34 million 02 customers with Virgin Media’s base, but also provide Virgin Media with a vehicle within which it could provide its own mobile service, which up to this point has been done in conjunction with other carriers. For 02, it is apparent that Telefonica has been trying to offload 02 for a number of years, because even though 02 has recently returned to profitability, the Spanish company is heavily indebted. The company has been in negotiations with a number of other entities regarding the sale of 02, but none have come to fruition, with planned sales to Three and BT falling through – BT opted to purchase EE for £12.5 billion in 2015 instead, and the EU blocked the £10.25 billion sale to Three on competition-based grounds.

However, in today’s business press Telefonica have confirmed that it has entered into talks with Liberty Global (who have more than $7 billion in assets spare after a recent spate of sales across its holdings). It is being suggested in the press that the deal could be finalised rather quickly, with Liberty Global paying Telefonica in the region of £5-7.5 billion to equalise the difference. Yet, it was a comment in the Financial Times last week, from somebody reportedly close to the Virgin Media side of the deal, that raises concerns. The sentence read: ‘Liberty Global, which has been trying to consolidate or sell most of its operations across Europe, sees the UK’s exit from the EU as an opportunity to combine with rivals without facing opposition from regulators in Brussels, a person close to Virgin Media said’. The article itself simply moves onto the next issue, but the sentiment within the sentence above is particularly impactful. Is it the case that European competition regulators are too heavy-handed? Or, is it the case that there is an ‘arbitrage’, in a sense, that is being developed by the UK leaving the EU, in so much that there now exists an opportunity to develop monopolistic, or oligopolistic markets in a crucial sector of the economy – telecommunications? A sceptic may opt for the second understanding, and for the company in question it makes sense to chase the rewards that come with developing such markets. However, for the British consumer, the news may not be so great. Further concentration in the telecommunications market will only lead to increased prices. It may also be an indicator of what the post-Brexit landscape looks like for the British consumer, with monopolistic deals being paraded as successes whilst the knock-on effect is ignored. Of course, this may not be the case, but the economic theory is clear – the development of monopolistic markets tends to lead to increased prices for consumers. How the British Government react to this potential deal will be a good indicator to its views on protecting the British consumer in the long-run, as opposed to its need to favour business and the development of the economy – particularly with the COVID-19 pandemic in mind – in the short-term.

Keywords – telecommunications, 02, Virgin Media, Liberty Global, monopoly, competition, @finregmatters

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lloyds Bank and the PPI Scandal: The Premature ‘Out of the Woods’ Rhetoric

Image
Today’s very short post focuses upon the news that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently extended the deadline to claim compensation for mis-sold ‘Payment Protection Insurance’ (PPI). Whilst a lot of financial institutions will have to prepare to offset the extended deadline, it is Lloyds that has grabbed the business headlines by apportioning an extra £350 million to offset any further claims that may be made of it – however, this comes only a week or two after the Bank posted its best performance figures in over a decade, as was previously discussed in Financial Regulation Matters . This post will therefore argue that the rhetoric being advanced recently regarding Lloyds – rhetoric like Lloyds represents ‘ a modern day success story ’ is wide of the mark and creates a false sense of security that we simply cannot afford to believe in. The ‘ robust recovery ’ was heralded far and wide upon the publication of Lloyds Bank’s financial performance for the previous fi
Read more

The Analytical Credit Rating Agency: A New Entrant That Will Further Enhance Russia’s Isolation

Image
This short post is based upon a forthcoming article by this author that examines the viability of the latest entrant into the credit rating arena, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA). The article, which is due to be published in the European Company Law Journal (and is available here in a pre-published version), looks at the chances of the ACRA succeeding when viewed within the parameters of perception , an aspect that underpins the credit rating sector. For this post, the focus will be upon introducing the ACRA, and then on examining the effect it may have upon the wider political issues affecting the Russian Federation. The Analytical Credit Rating Agency was established in November 2015 and comprises of 27 major Russian companies and financial institutions that serve as its shareholders. The agency, which became the first rating agency to receive accreditation from the Russian Central Bank under the new N 222-FZ Law which was designed to protect investors, has a re
Read more

The Case of Purdue Pharma, the Sackler Family, and the Opioid Crisis

Image
In the first of two short posts today, we will look at the case of the billionaire Sackler Family and their remarkable effect upon American society. The family, who own Purdue Pharma amongst a list of other ventures, have this week seen a massive legal action taken against them by the State of New York who argue that the company is ‘ responsible for the opioid epidemic ’ sweeping through the United States. The attorney-general for New York has called the lawsuit the ‘ nation’s most extensive ’ with respect to the pharmaceutical industry and comes right on the heels of a $270 million suit that was settled in the State of Oklahoma on exactly the same grounds. Whilst the company and the billionaire family who own it did not admit guilt (settling parties rarely do, hence why they settle outside of court) it has potentially opened the trapdoors for litigation. It comes as no surprise then that the company is reportedly considering bankruptcy proceedings in the face of such an onsl
Read more