Johnson & Johnson Ceases Selling Talcum Powder in the US and Canada – Update
Late last year we discussed here
in Financial Regulation Matters the news that Johnson & Johnson had
been ordered to pay billions of dollars in damages for the side effects that
talcum powder was causing. It had been suggested at the time that the spate of
litigation could end up costing the giant conglomerate more than $20 billion
and, just today, the news broke that the company would cease selling the
product in the US and Canada.
The talc-related saga for J&J is a long one. There has
been a vast number of legal actions taken against the company, with a number of
claimants being awarded large amounts, with one claim leading to $417
million in damages being awarded, and in another $4.7
billion to 22 women in the US. Interestingly Forbes said recently
that J&J stock may be undervalued,
but that may be about to change. The Financial Times is leading the way
with the reporting that the company has dropped
the sale of the product in the North American market, although they have
responded as expected. Firstly, the have claimed that the cessation will not be
too damaging, as the market only makes up 20% of the global market and the product
will remain on sale across the rest of the world. The head of the Consumer
Health division, Kathleen Widmer, was quoted in the article as blaming ‘misleading
litigation advertising’ as the cause for the drop in demand of the product. The
company points towards a mini-legal
industry that has emerged looking for claimants, with just under 20,000
lawsuits pending against the company. The company has maintained that its
product is safe, although it will now be switching to its cornstarch-based baby
powder instead of the talc-based product; also, its claims that the product is
widely regarded as being safe is not
universally accepted.
The decision will fall into the company’s decision to ‘streamline’
its product offering in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, but in reality it will
not stop the avalanche of legal action that is continuously heading its way.
However, there may be an opportunity to finally switch to a non-talc based
product irreversibly. Yet, the continued demand for the product around the
world means that this may be some way off, unless similar legal actions are
repeated in other markets.
Keywords – Talc, Johnson & Johnson, retail, business,
law, @finregmatters
Comments
Post a Comment