Scope Ratings Fined by ESMA

We have covered the European-based Scope Ratings a number of times in Financial Regulation Matters, here, here, and here. Also, recently the agency has received positive reviews in the financial press, with one outlet prescribing Scope Ratings as ‘the new challenger’ to the credit rating space, complete with a new approach. However, it was announced today that Scope Ratings had been fined by ESMA for a practice which is particularly familiar in the ratings arena – saying one thing and doing another.

 

The news broke this morning that ESMA had fined Scope for breaches of the Credit Rating Agencies Regulations (CRAR), to the tune of €640,000. ESMA also published a ‘public notice’ explaining the reason for the regulatory action. The regulator found that there were a number of breaches, with the fine being divided between: a failure to apply a methodology systematically (€550,000); and a failure to revise methodologies (€90,000). The action revolves around the time of 2015, a point in time which the regulator has since discovered that Scope adopted a particular ‘covered bonds methodology’ (CBM) and then never actually applied it. The methodology consisted of an analysis of an issuer’s strength, but also supposedly an analysis of the legal framework and also an analysis of the cover pool. Yet, when the ratings were issues Scope never actually applied this methodology properly even though it had declared it had, with the result being that ‘559 ratings [had been] issued without analysis being conducted according to the publicly disclosed CBM, our of a total of 622 ratings issued under the 2015 CBM’. Furthermore, ESMA also found that when changing to the 2016 version of the methodology, Scope did so without consulting the regulator nor, publicly at least, any stakeholders (in breach of CRAR).

 

Scope has the right to appeal against the decision, and it remains to be seen whether it will do so. Scope, for its part, has said that ‘at the time, Scope had inadvertently taken a different interpretation of relevant parts of EU legislation on credit rating agencies which turned out to be different from ESMA’s… since 2016, Scope has entirely remedied the issues identified by ESMA and reinforced its internal controls regarding he application of the relevant regulations’. The report from Nasdaq suggests that Scope have already made provisions for the fine, which suggests that it will not appeal.

 

Keywords – Scope Ratings, Scope, ESMA, regulation, business, @finregmatters


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lloyds Bank and the PPI Scandal: The Premature ‘Out of the Woods’ Rhetoric

Image
Today’s very short post focuses upon the news that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently extended the deadline to claim compensation for mis-sold ‘Payment Protection Insurance’ (PPI). Whilst a lot of financial institutions will have to prepare to offset the extended deadline, it is Lloyds that has grabbed the business headlines by apportioning an extra £350 million to offset any further claims that may be made of it – however, this comes only a week or two after the Bank posted its best performance figures in over a decade, as was previously discussed in Financial Regulation Matters . This post will therefore argue that the rhetoric being advanced recently regarding Lloyds – rhetoric like Lloyds represents ‘ a modern day success story ’ is wide of the mark and creates a false sense of security that we simply cannot afford to believe in. The ‘ robust recovery ’ was heralded far and wide upon the publication of Lloyds Bank’s financial performance for the previous fi
Read more

The Analytical Credit Rating Agency: A New Entrant That Will Further Enhance Russia’s Isolation

Image
This short post is based upon a forthcoming article by this author that examines the viability of the latest entrant into the credit rating arena, the Analytical Credit Rating Agency (ACRA). The article, which is due to be published in the European Company Law Journal (and is available here in a pre-published version), looks at the chances of the ACRA succeeding when viewed within the parameters of perception , an aspect that underpins the credit rating sector. For this post, the focus will be upon introducing the ACRA, and then on examining the effect it may have upon the wider political issues affecting the Russian Federation. The Analytical Credit Rating Agency was established in November 2015 and comprises of 27 major Russian companies and financial institutions that serve as its shareholders. The agency, which became the first rating agency to receive accreditation from the Russian Central Bank under the new N 222-FZ Law which was designed to protect investors, has a re
Read more

The Case of Purdue Pharma, the Sackler Family, and the Opioid Crisis

Image
In the first of two short posts today, we will look at the case of the billionaire Sackler Family and their remarkable effect upon American society. The family, who own Purdue Pharma amongst a list of other ventures, have this week seen a massive legal action taken against them by the State of New York who argue that the company is ‘ responsible for the opioid epidemic ’ sweeping through the United States. The attorney-general for New York has called the lawsuit the ‘ nation’s most extensive ’ with respect to the pharmaceutical industry and comes right on the heels of a $270 million suit that was settled in the State of Oklahoma on exactly the same grounds. Whilst the company and the billionaire family who own it did not admit guilt (settling parties rarely do, hence why they settle outside of court) it has potentially opened the trapdoors for litigation. It comes as no surprise then that the company is reportedly considering bankruptcy proceedings in the face of such an onsl
Read more